The White
House has refused to rule out the possibility of US President Barack Obama
using an executive action to shut down the Guantanamo Bay prison if Congress
continued to oppose his move to do so. I am not going to stand up here and
unilaterally take any options off the table when it comes to the president’s use
of his executive authority said White House spokesman Josh Earnest hours after
Republican lawmakers rejected Mr Obama’s proposal to move the inmates to
prisons on the mainland US. On Tuesday, President Obama announced a
long-awaited proposal to close the US detention facility at Guantanamo Bay in
Cuba, arguing that the prison undermines national security and is contrary to
American values.
He also said that extremist groups such as the Islamic State
use the prison as a recruiting tool to foment hatred against the West. But
Republican lawmakers, who control both chambers of the US Congress, have
rejected his plan as vague and dangerous.Since it includes bringing dan gerous
terrorists to facilities in US communities, he should know that the bipartisan
will of Congress has already been expressed against that proposal, said Senate
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican.It is against the law and it will stay against the law to transfer
terrorist detainees to American soil.
We will not jeopardize our national
security over a campaign promise,” said Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan. Responding
to this outright rejection, the White House press secretary said he saw an emerging
trend in Congress that has worsened in just the last few weeks. Congress is
actually refusing to engage. They’re refusing to consider” plans and proposals
put forth by the administration. White House aides, who briefed the media on
Tuesday afternoon, rejected the Republican claim that their plan would bring
dangerous criminals to the mainland.
They pointed out that less than 10 per
cent of former Guantanamo detainees have gone back to militant activities. House
Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, however, endorsed Mr
Obama’s plan. Closing the detention facility at Guantanamo will strengthen our
national security and affirm our values and laws, she said. It is disappointing
that Republicans have worked to prevent the long-overdue closure of the
Guantanamo facility. Civil liberties groups also have hailed the plan but said
it was short of their expectations.
Anthony Romero, executive director of the
American Civil Liberties Union, said closing the facility would “erase the stain
on America’s moral standing at home and abroad. But Mr Romero also said that
the president’s decision to preserve military commissions to try the suspected
terrorists is a mistake. The Guantanamo military commissions are an abject
failure, he said. They have never worked, are not working and will never work. Another
human rights group, Amnesty International, said in a statement, said it opposed
the plan to keep the prisoners in continued detention on the mainland.
It won’t
appease members of Congress who appear bent on making Guantanamo a permanent
offshore prison for individuals captured in a global, apparently endless war. And
it won’t end indefinite detention,
Amnesty said The Centre for Constitutional Rights, an organisation whose
lawyers have represented multiple Guantanamo detainees, said the plan “does not
‘close Guantanamo,’ it merely relocates it to a new ZIP code. There are 91
detainees remaining at the facility, compared with more than 200 when President
Obama took office. At its peak, the prison held nearly 800 detainees. The
George W. Bush administration transferred more than 500 of them to other
countries. Closing the prison would fulfill a pledge that Mr Obama made in his
2008 election campaign.
No comments:
Post a Comment